RAMA CHANDRA PARIDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10134/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

CNR: ODHC010232592026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C)/13778/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10134/2026

Registration Date

31-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

RAMA CHANDRA PARIDA

Adv. TUSHAR KANTA NAYAK,M.PANDA,M.PANDA, M.PANDA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, BHUBANESWAR

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KEONJHAR

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

09-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

The High Court of Orissa quashed the Director of Secondary Education's rejection order dated 29.10.2025 and granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh detailed representation with the Commissioner-cum-Secretary within three weeks, directing the government to consider the claim on merit within eight weeks while taking note of similar benefits already extended to similarly situated employees. The court found that the petitioner's claim had not been duly considered on its own merit as previously directed by an earlier bench order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa quashed the Director of Secondary Education's rejection order dated 29.10.2025 and granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh detailed representation with the Commissioner-cum-Secretary within three weeks, directing the government to consider the claim on merit within eight weeks while taking note of similar benefits already extended to similarly situated employees. The court found that the petitioner's claim had not been duly considered on its own merit as previously directed by an earlier bench order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case