RAMA CHANDRA PARIDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10134/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010232592026

Filing Number

WP(C)/13778/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10134/2026

Registration Date

31-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMA CHANDRA PARIDA

    Adv. TUSHAR KANTA NAYAK,M.PANDA,M.PANDA, M.PANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KEONJHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa quashed the Director of Secondary Education's rejection order dated 29.10.2025 and granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh detailed representation with the Commissioner-cum-Secretary within three weeks, directing the government to consider the claim on merit within eight weeks while taking note of similar benefits already extended to similarly situated employees. The court found that the petitioner's claim had not been duly considered on its own merit as previously directed by an earlier bench order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa quashed the Director of Secondary Education's rejection order dated 29.10.2025 and granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh detailed representation with the Commissioner-cum-Secretary within three weeks, directing the government to consider the claim on merit within eight weeks while taking note of similar benefits already extended to similarly situated employees. The court found that the petitioner's claim had not been duly considered on its own merit as previously directed by an earlier bench order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case