BADRI NARAYAN BEHURIA vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/1086/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010225452026
Filing Number
CRLMC/9219/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLMC/1086/2026
Registration Date
31-Mar-2026
Judge
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
Coram
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BADRI NARAYAN BEHURIA
Adv. AMULYA RATNA PANDA,S.DASH, S.SAHOO,S.DASH, S.SAHOO, S.DASH, S.SAHOO
-
2.MANJULATA BEHURIA
-
3.BIDULATA BEHURIA
-
4.SANDHYARANI MOHANTY @ SANDHYARANI BEHURIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
Summary The Orissa High Court quashed a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against the petitioners on 10.03.2026 for their absence from court, accepting their explanation that they failed to appear due to non-communication by their counsel despite having a regular attendance record. The court directed the petitioners to surrender and apply for bail within 15 days with stringent conditions, and imposed a cost of Rs. 500 each for violating the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission - Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 Bnss- Bail Jump/Quashment Of NBW
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMC/1086/2026
Summary The Orissa High Court quashed a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against the petitioners on 10.03.2026 for their absence from court, accepting their explanation that they failed to appear due to non-communication by their counsel despite having a regular attendance record. The court directed the petitioners to surrender and apply for bail within 15 days with stringent conditions, and imposed a cost of Rs. 500 each for violating the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts