PARBATI MOHARANA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9615/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010223502026

Filing Number

WP(C)/13187/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/9615/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera

Coram

Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARBATI MOHARANA

    Adv. BISWAJIT NAYAK,S.SAMANTRAY, A.K.PATRA,S.SAMANTRAY, A.K.PATRA, S.SAMANTRAY, A.K.PATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR, CUTTACK

  3. 3.CIVIL SUPPLIES OFFICER, CUTTACK

  4. 4.BHIMESWAR PACS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SAMITANGA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra BeheraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioners' interim applications seeking corrections to its previous order dated 09.04.2026. The court directed that the State of Odisha (instead of the Collector and Civil Supplies Officer) extend the token validity period for the petitioners to purchase paddy as indicated in their respective tokens without harassment. The corrected order was to be implemented immediately upon production of the certified copy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra BeheraView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Ananda Chandra Behera

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/9615/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioners' interim applications seeking corrections to its previous order dated 09.04.2026. The court directed that the State of Odisha (instead of the Collector and Civil Supplies Officer) extend the token validity period for the petitioners to purchase paddy as indicated in their respective tokens without harassment. The corrected order was to be implemented immediately upon production of the certified copy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case