LAXMIDHAR SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9821/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: ODHC010220142026

Filing Number

WP(C)/12992/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/9821/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PENSION ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAXMIDHAR SAHOO

    Adv. TUSHAR KANTA NAYAK,M.PANDA,M.PANDA, M.PANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ODISHA, BBSR

  3. 3.D.E.O., KEONJHAR

  4. 4.CONTROLLER OF ACCOUNTS, ODISHA

  5. 5.DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, KEONJHAR

  6. 6.SUB TRASURY, ANANDAPUR

  7. 7.BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, ANANDAPUR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Case Status Summary: The High Court of Orissa admitted the writ petition WP(C) No.9821 of 2026 filed by Laxmidhar Sahoo against the State of Odisha. Notices were issued to all opposite parties with a short returnable date, and requisites must be filed within three working days. As an interim measure, the court halted any recovery from the petitioner's pension/commuted pension value until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/9821/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: The High Court of Orissa admitted the writ petition WP(C) No.9821 of 2026 filed by Laxmidhar Sahoo against the State of Odisha. Notices were issued to all opposite parties with a short returnable date, and requisites must be filed within three working days. As an interim measure, the court halted any recovery from the petitioner's pension/commuted pension value until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case