GORACHAND PARIDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10126/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010219632026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/12957/2026
Filing Date
24-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/10126/2026
Registration Date
31-03-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Coram
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
REGULARISATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GORACHAND PARIDA
Adv. SUKANTA KUMAR DALAI,J.J.JYOTI, S.R.SWAIN, S.MAHAPATRA, B.BHUYAN, J.BHUYAN, S.K.PANDA,J.J.JYOTI, S.R.SWAIN, S.MAHAPATRA, B.BHUYAN, J.BHUYAN, S.K.PANDA, J.J.JYOTI, S.R.SWAIN, S.MAHAPATRA, B.BHUYAN, J.BHUYAN, S.K.PANDA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
THE DIRECTOR, MUNICIAPL ADMINISTRATION, GOVT. OF ODISHA, H AND UD DEPARTMENT, BHUBANESWAR
COLLECTOR, CUTTACK
KHURDA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KHURDA
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KHURDA MUNICIPALITY, KHURDA
ATHAGARH NAC, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ATHAGARH
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ATHAGARH NAC, ATHAGARH
SURENDRANATH SAHOO
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State within two weeks, with supporting documents and citations regarding his claim for service regularization. The Court directed the State to take a lawful decision on the representation within six weeks of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than directly granting the requested mandamus for regularization with retrospective effect and consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State within two weeks, with supporting documents and citations regarding his claim for service regularization. The Court directed the State to take a lawful decision on the representation within six weeks of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than directly granting the requested mandamus for regularization with retrospective effect and consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts