GORACHAND PARIDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10126/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010219632026

e-Filing Number

24-03-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/12957/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10126/2026

Registration Date

31-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

REGULARISATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GORACHAND PARIDA

    Adv. SUKANTA KUMAR DALAI,J.J.JYOTI, S.R.SWAIN, S.MAHAPATRA, B.BHUYAN, J.BHUYAN, S.K.PANDA,J.J.JYOTI, S.R.SWAIN, S.MAHAPATRA, B.BHUYAN, J.BHUYAN, S.K.PANDA, J.J.JYOTI, S.R.SWAIN, S.MAHAPATRA, B.BHUYAN, J.BHUYAN, S.K.PANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR, MUNICIAPL ADMINISTRATION, GOVT. OF ODISHA, H AND UD DEPARTMENT, BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.COLLECTOR, CUTTACK

  4. 4.KHURDA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KHURDA

  5. 5.EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KHURDA MUNICIPALITY, KHURDA

  6. 6.ATHAGARH NAC, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ATHAGARH

  7. 7.EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ATHAGARH NAC, ATHAGARH

  8. 8.SURENDRANATH SAHOO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State within two weeks, with supporting documents and citations regarding his claim for service regularization. The Court directed the State to take a lawful decision on the representation within six weeks of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than directly granting the requested mandamus for regularization with retrospective effect and consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State within two weeks, with supporting documents and citations regarding his claim for service regularization. The Court directed the State to take a lawful decision on the representation within six weeks of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than directly granting the requested mandamus for regularization with retrospective effect and consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case