MD SAMSER ALAM @ KALLU vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/1126/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010219382026

e-Filing Number

24-03-2026

Filing Number

CRLMC/8975/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLMC/1126/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Coram

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD SAMSER ALAM @ KALLU

    Adv. BISWARANJAN DALAI,M.DAS, D.LENKA, R.K.JENA, L.MOHARANA,M.DAS, D.LENKA, R.K.JENA, L.MOHARANA, M.DAS, D.LENKA, R.K.JENA, L.MOHARANA

  2. 2.MD. ABID HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa quashed the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against the petitioners on 10.03.2026, accepting their explanation that non-appearance was due to lack of communication from their conducting counsel, despite their regular court attendance and existing bail. The petitioners were directed to surrender within 15 working days and apply for bail with stringent conditions, and each must pay Rs. 500 as cost for violating the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission - Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 Bnss- Bail Jump/Quashment Of NBW

    Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMC/1126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa quashed the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against the petitioners on 10.03.2026, accepting their explanation that non-appearance was due to lack of communication from their conducting counsel, despite their regular court attendance and existing bail. The petitioners were directed to surrender within 15 working days and apply for bail with stringent conditions, and each must pay Rs. 500 as cost for violating the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case