KSHETRABASI MAHANTA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /9789/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010219342026
Filing Number
WP(C) /12940/2026
Filing Date
24-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C) /9789/2026
Registration Date
28-03-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Coram
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
SALARY/ARREAR SALARY ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KSHETRABASI MAHANTA
Adv. SATYAJIT MOHAPATRA (
,K.MOHANTY, A.K.MISHRA,K.MOHANTY, A.K.MISHRA, K.MOHANTY, A.K.MISHRA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, OSEPA, BHUBANESWAR
COLLECTOR AND DIST.MAGISTRATE, KEONJHAR
DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER CUM DISTRICT PROJECT COORDINATOR, SSA, KEONJHAR
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE, BALASORE DIV.
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Kshetrabasi Mahanta, granting him liberty to file a fresh representation before the State Project Director, OSEPA within three weeks, addressing his grievance regarding gratuity and unutilised leave salary. The Opposite Party No. 2 is directed to consider and dispose of the representation within two months with a reasoned order, applying principles from the Chittaranjan Senapati judgment, and communicate the decision within ten days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Kshetrabasi Mahanta, granting him liberty to file a fresh representation before the State Project Director, OSEPA within three weeks, addressing his grievance regarding gratuity and unutilised leave salary. The Opposite Party No. 2 is directed to consider and dispose of the representation within two months with a reasoned order, applying principles from the Chittaranjan Senapati judgment, and communicate the decision within ten days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts