KSHETRABASI MAHANTA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9789/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010219342026
Filing Number
WP(C)/12940/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/9789/2026
Registration Date
28-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Coram
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
SALARY/ARREAR SALARY ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KSHETRABASI MAHANTA
Adv. SATYAJIT MOHAPATRA (
-
2.,K.MOHANTY, A.K.MISHRA,K.MOHANTY, A.K.MISHRA, K.MOHANTY, A.K.MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, OSEPA, BHUBANESWAR
-
3.COLLECTOR AND DIST.MAGISTRATE, KEONJHAR
-
4.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER CUM DISTRICT PROJECT COORDINATOR, SSA, KEONJHAR
-
5.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE, BALASORE DIV.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Kshetrabasi Mahanta, granting him liberty to file a fresh representation before the State Project Director, OSEPA within three weeks, addressing his grievance regarding gratuity and unutilised leave salary. The Opposite Party No. 2 is directed to consider and dispose of the representation within two months with a reasoned order, applying principles from the Chittaranjan Senapati judgment, and communicate the decision within ten days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/9789/2026
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Kshetrabasi Mahanta, granting him liberty to file a fresh representation before the State Project Director, OSEPA within three weeks, addressing his grievance regarding gratuity and unutilised leave salary. The Opposite Party No. 2 is directed to consider and dispose of the representation within two months with a reasoned order, applying principles from the Chittaranjan Senapati judgment, and communicate the decision within ten days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts