BULU @ JOGENDRA DEEP vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/1125/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010216312026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

CRLMC/8863/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLMC/1125/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Coram

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BULU @ JOGENDRA DEEP

    Adv. JAGABANDHU SAHU,S.K.MOHANTY, S.K.TRIPATHY, A.PUROHIT,S.K.MOHANTY, S.K.TRIPATHY, A.PUROHIT, S.K.MOHANTY, S.K.TRIPATHY, A.PUROHIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa quashed the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against the petitioner on 21.02.2024, accepting his explanation that his absence was due to non-communication by his counsel and his undertaking to cooperate in trial. The petitioner was directed to surrender and apply for bail within 15 working days, with stringent conditions imposed, and ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the Bargarh Bar Association for violating the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission - Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 Bnss- Bail Jump/Quashment Of NBW

    Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMC/1125/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa quashed the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against the petitioner on 21.02.2024, accepting his explanation that his absence was due to non-communication by his counsel and his undertaking to cooperate in trial. The petitioner was directed to surrender and apply for bail within 15 working days, with stringent conditions imposed, and ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the Bargarh Bar Association for violating the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case