SRIKANTA DHAL vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLREV/239/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010214402026

Filing Number

CRLREV/8788/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLREV/239/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRIKANTA DHAL

    Adv. SK. ZAFARULLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner's revision petition and directed release of the vehicle seized in a criminal case, subject to deposit of Rs. 1,50,000 as cash security. The court balanced the petitioner's interest in preventing vehicle depreciation against the state's concern that release would reward violation of earlier court orders, by imposing the security deposit as a deterrent while allowing vehicle release pending trial outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission - Criminal Revision

    Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLREV/239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner's revision petition and directed release of the vehicle seized in a criminal case, subject to deposit of Rs. 1,50,000 as cash security. The court balanced the petitioner's interest in preventing vehicle depreciation against the state's concern that release would reward violation of earlier court orders, by imposing the security deposit as a deterrent while allowing vehicle release pending trial outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case