BABA SIDHESWAR WSHG vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9293/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010213292026
e-Filing Number
22-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/12560/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/9293/2026
Registration Date
24-03-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Coram
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BABA SIDHESWAR WSHG
Adv. SRINIVAS MOHANTY,K.PATRA, S.R.MOHANTY, E.DASH,K.PATRA, S.R.MOHANTY, E.DASH, K.PATRA, S.R.MOHANTY, E.DASH
UMA MAHESWARI WSHG, ACHANDA
MAA SUBHALAXMI SHG, BAGACHHERA
APARNA WSHG, LACHHIPUR
MAA BIRAJA WSHG, BHIMTIKIRA
OM SHIVA SHAKTI WSHG, BALADI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
COLLECTOR CUM DIST.MAGISTRATE, SUBARNAPUR
MANAGING DIRECTOR, OSCSC LTD., BHUBANESWAR
CHIEF CIVIL SUPPLIES OFFICER-CUM-DISTRICT MANAGER, OSCSC LTD., SUBARNAPUR
DISTRICT PROJECT COORDINATOR, MISSION SHAKTI, SUBARNAPUR
DRCS, SUBARNAPUR
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 20-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary The Orissa High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by six Self-Help Groups (SHGs) challenging their exclusion from paddy procurement for KMS 2025-26, without quashing the state's debarment order. Instead, the court granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Civil Court to claim compensation by proving their illegal debarment, upholding the principle that access to justice is a fundamental right available through appropriate legal forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Orissa High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by six Self-Help Groups (SHGs) challenging their exclusion from paddy procurement for KMS 2025-26, without quashing the state's debarment order. Instead, the court granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Civil Court to claim compensation by proving their illegal debarment, upholding the principle that access to justice is a fundamental right available through appropriate legal forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts