PRAKASH KUMAR MISHRA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10148/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010212212026

Filing Number

WP(C)/12481/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10148/2026

Registration Date

31-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PENSION ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH KUMAR MISHRA

    Adv. BIREN SANKAR TRIPATHY,M.K.RATH, J.PATI, P.P.TRIPATHY, M.GUPTA, S.SAHOO,,M.K.RATH, J.PATI, P.P.TRIPATHY, M.GUPTA, S.SAHOO,, M.K.RATH, J.PATI, P.P.TRIPATHY, M.GUPTA, S.SAHOO,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYT TO GOVT. FINANCE DEPARTMENT, ODISHA

  3. 3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, RWS AND S DEPARTMENT, ODISHA

  4. 4.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RWS AND S CIRCLE, BHUBANESWAR

  5. 5.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RWS AND S DIVISION, PURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the writ petition filed by Prakash Kumar Mishra as withdrawn, permitting him to file a fresh petition with better particulars and complete details. The court granted this liberty to the petitioner on his counsel's request, allowing him to rectify deficiencies in the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the writ petition filed by Prakash Kumar Mishra as withdrawn, permitting him to file a fresh petition with better particulars and complete details. The court granted this liberty to the petitioner on his counsel's request, allowing him to rectify deficiencies in the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case