PRANAYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9784/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010211672026
Filing Number
WP(C)/12444/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/9784/2026
Registration Date
28-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Coram
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
REGULARISATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRANAYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Adv. SUBHRANSU BHUSAN MOHANTY,S.MOHAPATRA, B.B.MOHAPATRA,S.MOHAPATRA, B.B.MOHAPATRA, S.MOHAPATRA, B.B.MOHAPATRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.DIRECTOR , HIGHER EDUCATION,BHUBANESWAR
-
3.SECRETAIY-CUM-PRINCIPAL, RAMACHANDI MAHAVIDYALAYA,KHURDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Pranaya Kumar Mohapatra, a retired English Lecturer, by directing the Secretary of the Department of Higher Education to consider his pending representation within eight weeks with a reasoned order. The court found merit in the petitioner's grievance regarding alleged discrimination in service regularization compared to similarly situated lecturers and allowed him to file additional supporting documents, while granting the department discretion to provide a hearing if deemed necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/9784/2026
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Pranaya Kumar Mohapatra, a retired English Lecturer, by directing the Secretary of the Department of Higher Education to consider his pending representation within eight weeks with a reasoned order. The court found merit in the petitioner's grievance regarding alleged discrimination in service regularization compared to similarly situated lecturers and allowed him to file additional supporting documents, while granting the department discretion to provide a hearing if deemed necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts