ARABINDA SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/1041/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010206572026

Filing Number

CRLMC/8484/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLMC/1041/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Coram

Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARABINDA SAHOO

    Adv. SURYAKANTA DWIBEDI,R.K.MAHANTA, S.S.DASH, K.M.HATI, S.K.BEHERA,R.K.MAHANTA, S.S.DASH, K.M.HATI, S.K.BEHERA, R.K.MAHANTA, S.S.DASH, K.M.HATI, S.K.BEHERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa partially granted the petitioner's plea in a ganja smuggling case (48 kg seized), waiving the onerous financial conditions (Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, property surety, and Rs. 5,000 cash security) imposed by the lower court due to the petitioner's financial hardship. The court ordered release of the seized mobile phones, smartwatch, and silver kada to the petitioner on the condition that he produce them when required and not alter their nature or character. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 Bnss.

    Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMC/1041/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa partially granted the petitioner's plea in a ganja smuggling case (48 kg seized), waiving the onerous financial conditions (Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, property surety, and Rs. 5,000 cash security) imposed by the lower court due to the petitioner's financial hardship. The court ordered release of the seized mobile phones, smartwatch, and silver kada to the petitioner on the condition that he produce them when required and not alter their nature or character. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case