NIRMALA BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10132/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010205272026

Filing Number

WP(C)/12092/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10132/2026

Registration Date

31-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMALA BEHERA

    Adv. PRASANTA KUMAR JENA,B.B.ROUT, M.MOHANTY, S.NAYAK,,B.B.ROUT, M.MOHANTY, S.NAYAK,, B.B.ROUT, M.MOHANTY, S.NAYAK,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND EX OFFICIO ADDL. SECRETARY TO GOVT., H AND UD DEPT.

  3. 3.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, ROURKELA MUNICIPAL CORP.

  4. 4.ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUNDARGARH CUM PD, DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, SUNDARGARH

  5. 5.STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BHUBANESWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of Nirmala Behera's writ petition seeking regularization of her service as a community organizer, directing the State of Odisha to consider her representation within three months in accordance with law. The court did not express any opinion on the merits, instead adopting a consensual approach agreed upon by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10132/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of Nirmala Behera's writ petition seeking regularization of her service as a community organizer, directing the State of Odisha to consider her representation within three months in accordance with law. The court did not express any opinion on the merits, instead adopting a consensual approach agreed upon by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case