ABDUL AHAD ALIAS ABDUL AHAD KHAN M/S.DEBASIS TRIPATHY, T.KUMAR,MR. BANSIDHAR BAUG vs SAYED JAMAL SAHED — WP(C)/16521/2016

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Sep-2016

CNR: ODHC010204912016

Filing Number

WP(C)/16521/2016

Filing Date

19-Sep-2016

Registration No

WP(C)/16521/2016

Registration Date

19-Sep-2016

Judge

Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ( 30 )

Sub-Category

WAKF BOARD MATTERS. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL AHAD ALIAS ABDUL AHAD KHAN M/S.DEBASIS TRIPATHY, T.KUMAR,MR. BANSIDHAR BAUG

  2. 2.ABDUL SAHIM @A.S.KHAN

    Adv. MR. BANSIDHAR BAUG T.KUMAR

  3. 3.S.KHAN

    Adv. MR. BANSIDHAR BAUG T.KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAYED JAMAL SAHED

    Adv. S.K.MOHANTY,M/S GOKHA BEHERA, G.P MOHANTY, S. ROY, S,K MOHANTY, J.R BEHERA,M/S.MANOJ PANIGRAHI, S.N.PRADHAN 1123

  2. 2.MAHIRUDDIN KHAN

    Adv. S.K.MOHANTY M/S GOKHA BEHERA, G.P MOHANTY, S. ROY, S,K MOHANTY, J.R BEHERA M/S.MANOJ PANIGRAHI, S.N.PRADHAN

  3. 3.INUS KAHN

    Adv. S.K.MOHANTY M/S GOKHA BEHERA, G.P MOHANTY, S. ROY, S,K MOHANTY, J.R BEHERA M/S.MANOJ PANIGRAHI, S.N.PRADHAN

  4. 4.ORISSA BOARD OF WAKF

    Adv. S.K.MOHANTY M/S GOKHA BEHERA, G.P MOHANTY, S. ROY, S,K MOHANTY, J.R BEHERA M/S.MANOJ PANIGRAHI, S.N.PRADHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition challenging the Wakf Tribunal's order that impleaded legal heirs of deceased defendants (Nos. 1, 7, 8 & 9) as parties to the suit. The court held that while an Order-22, Rule-4 CPC application would not be maintainable when defendants were dead prior to filing, an Order-1, Rule-10 CPC petition to implead legal representatives is valid and necessary for effective and complete adjudication of disputes. The Tribunal properly exercised its discretionary power to add parties for ensuring complete resolution of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Miss Justice Savitri Ratho

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Miss Justice Savitri Ratho

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Miss Justice Savitri Ratho

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Miss Justice Savitri Ratho

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF

  15. 08-Jul-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  16. 05-May-2025

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  17. 05-May-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  18. 17-Feb-2025

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

  19. 17-Feb-2025

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  20. 23-Dec-2024

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

  21. 23-Dec-2024

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  22. 13-Nov-2024

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

  23. 06-Nov-2024

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra , Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  25. 23-Oct-2024

    Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra,mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

  26. 03-Jul-2023

    Dr. Justice B.r.sarangi,mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF

  27. 23-Mar-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  28. 23-Mar-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  29. 23-Mar-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  30. 06-Mar-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  31. 27-Feb-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  32. 23-Feb-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  33. 10-Feb-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  34. 12-Jan-2017

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  35. 20-Dec-2016

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija,mr. Justice K.r.mohapatraView PDF

  36. 20-Dec-2016

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice S.c.parija , Mr. Justice K.r.mohapatra

  37. 05-Dec-2016

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Kumari Justice Sanju Panda

  38. 25-Oct-2016

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Kumari Justice Sanju Panda

  39. 22-Sep-2016

    Mr. Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad,kumari Justice Sanju PandaView PDF

  40. 22-Sep-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 19-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/16521/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition challenging the Wakf Tribunal's order that impleaded legal heirs of deceased defendants (Nos. 1, 7, 8 & 9) as parties to the suit. The court held that while an Order-22, Rule-4 CPC application would not be maintainable when defendants were dead prior to filing, an Order-1, Rule-10 CPC petition to implead legal representatives is valid and necessary for effective and complete adjudication of disputes. The Tribunal properly exercised its discretionary power to add parties for ensuring complete resolution of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case