BIRANCHI NARAYAN NATH vs THE STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /8659/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010204072026
Filing Number
WP(C) /12020/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C) /8659/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Coram
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
PROMOTION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BIRANCHI NARAYAN NATH
Adv. PRABIN DAS,S.PRIYADARSAN, P.MOHANTY, S.DASH,S.PRIYADARSAN, P.MOHANTY, S.DASH, S.PRIYADARSAN, P.MOHANTY, S.DASH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF ODISHA
THE ASST. CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (ADMINISTRATION), BHUBANESWAR
THE D.F.O., BERHAMPUR DIVISION
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner's prayer for 18% interest on unutilized earned leave salary was already adjudicated in an earlier petition (W.P.(C) No.26423 of 2023), where the court had directed authorities to decide the claim and a contempt petition was subsequently disposed of on 26.06.2025. The court found that filing a fresh writ petition with identical prayers was not maintainable and directed the petitioner to take appropriate action in the previously disposed petition instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner's prayer for 18% interest on unutilized earned leave salary was already adjudicated in an earlier petition (W.P.(C) No.26423 of 2023), where the court had directed authorities to decide the claim and a contempt petition was subsequently disposed of on 26.06.2025. The court found that filing a fresh writ petition with identical prayers was not maintainable and directed the petitioner to take appropriate action in the previously disposed petition instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts