NETI @ APU @ RAKESH KUMAR DAS vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/2583/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 439. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: ODHC010202782026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

BLAPL/8306/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/2583/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 439
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NETI @ APU @ RAKESH KUMAR DAS

    Adv. KULDEEP MOHANTY, A.DASH, A.KAMAL. S.K.MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted interim bail to petitioner Neti @ Apu @ Rakesh Kumar Das for 3 days (24.03.2026 to 28.03.2026) on humanitarian grounds to perform the first death anniversary of his mother scheduled for 26.03.2026, while keeping the regular bail application pending. The interim bail is conditional on furnishing a surety who must be a blood relation or family member, and the petitioner must surrender to custody upon expiry or face recommittal to jail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders - Interim Bail

    Mr. Justice Gourishankar Satapathy

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/2583/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted interim bail to petitioner Neti @ Apu @ Rakesh Kumar Das for 3 days (24.03.2026 to 28.03.2026) on humanitarian grounds to perform the first death anniversary of his mother scheduled for 26.03.2026, while keeping the regular bail application pending. The interim bail is conditional on furnishing a surety who must be a blood relation or family member, and the petitioner must surrender to custody upon expiry or face recommittal to jail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case