DIMPLE SANDIL vs PROJECT DIRECTOR OF NHAI, PROJECT IMPLEMENTION UNIT, KEONJHAR — WP(C)/8722/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010201752026

Filing Number

WP(C)/11872/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/8722/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Coram

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

EVICTION UNDER THE PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION) ACT ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIMPLE SANDIL

    Adv. SIDHARTHA DAS,V.R.BEHERA, S.S.OJHA, S.JENA, S.DAS,V.R.BEHERA, S.S.OJHA, S.JENA, S.DAS, V.R.BEHERA, S.S.OJHA, S.JENA, S.DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PROJECT DIRECTOR OF NHAI, PROJECT IMPLEMENTION UNIT, KEONJHAR

  2. 2.COLLECTOR CUM DIST.MAGISTRATE, KEONJHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, allowing petitioner Dimple Sandil seven days to submit a show-cause reply to NHAI's notice claiming Plot No.199/848 as part of a highway without proper measurement. NHAI must then consider the reply with due hearing and decide within four weeks with proper measurement, while status-quo is maintained on the disputed land until a final decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/8722/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, allowing petitioner Dimple Sandil seven days to submit a show-cause reply to NHAI's notice claiming Plot No.199/848 as part of a highway without proper measurement. NHAI must then consider the reply with due hearing and decide within four weeks with proper measurement, while status-quo is maintained on the disputed land until a final decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case