SACHI BEHERA vs MONINGI SARITA RANI — CMP/520/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: ODHC010201282026
Filing Number
CMP/11839/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
CMP/520/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Coram
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SACHI BEHERA
Adv. PRABHASI NAYAK,K.MOHANTY,K.MOHANTY, K.MOHANTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.MONINGI SARITA RANI
-
2.RASMITA SAMANTRAY
-
3.LAXMIPRIYA PADHY
-
4.O2 HEIGHT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, GANJAM
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
SUMMARY: The High Court of Orissa admitted the CMP petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application to add defendants. The Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that the additional parties were necessary for effective adjudication and decided to hear the matter further. Notice has been issued to opposite parties with a returnable date in the week of June 22, 2026, and an interim order grants the trial court eight weeks' adjournment upon the petitioner's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission 1
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP/520/2026
SUMMARY: The High Court of Orissa admitted the CMP petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application to add defendants. The Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that the additional parties were necessary for effective adjudication and decided to hear the matter further. Notice has been issued to opposite parties with a returnable date in the week of June 22, 2026, and an interim order grants the trial court eight weeks' adjournment upon the petitioner's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts