SACHI BEHERA vs MONINGI SARITA RANI — CMP/520/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: ODHC010201282026

Filing Number

CMP/11839/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CMP/520/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SACHI BEHERA

    Adv. PRABHASI NAYAK,K.MOHANTY,K.MOHANTY, K.MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MONINGI SARITA RANI

  2. 2.RASMITA SAMANTRAY

  3. 3.LAXMIPRIYA PADHY

  4. 4.O2 HEIGHT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, GANJAM

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Orissa admitted the CMP petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application to add defendants. The Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that the additional parties were necessary for effective adjudication and decided to hear the matter further. Notice has been issued to opposite parties with a returnable date in the week of June 22, 2026, and an interim order grants the trial court eight weeks' adjournment upon the petitioner's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission 1

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/520/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Orissa admitted the CMP petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's application to add defendants. The Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that the additional parties were necessary for effective adjudication and decided to hear the matter further. Notice has been issued to opposite parties with a returnable date in the week of June 22, 2026, and an interim order grants the trial court eight weeks' adjournment upon the petitioner's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case