MADHUMITA PANDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /9774/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010200572026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C) /11793/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /9774/2026

Registration Date

28-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

MADHUMITA PANDA

Adv. BIREN SANKAR TRIPATHY, M.K.RATH, J.PATI, P.P.TRIPATHY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

THE DIRECTOR,ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ODISHA

THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KORAPUT

THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, NANDAPUR

THE CHAIRPERSON, SCHOOL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, BUDHADEV VIDYAPITHA UP(ME) SCHOOL, HIKIMPUT

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

31-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

31-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

The High Court of Orissa directed the District Education Officer (Opposite Party No.3) to consider Madhumita Panda's pending representation for approval of her appointment as an Assistant Teacher under the grant-in-aid scheme and communicate a final decision within eight weeks. The court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, finding the petitioner's request reasonable given that her case had been pending despite a prior court direction and proper qualifications (B.Ed degree obtained in 2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa directed the District Education Officer (Opposite Party No.3) to consider Madhumita Panda's pending representation for approval of her appointment as an Assistant Teacher under the grant-in-aid scheme and communicate a final decision within eight weeks. The court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, finding the petitioner's request reasonable given that her case had been pending despite a prior court direction and proper qualifications (B.Ed degree obtained in 2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case