MADHUMITA PANDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9774/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010200572026
Filing Number
WP(C)/11793/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/9774/2026
Registration Date
28-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Coram
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHUMITA PANDA
Adv. BIREN SANKAR TRIPATHY, M.K.RATH, J.PATI, P.P.TRIPATHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.THE DIRECTOR,ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ODISHA
-
3.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KORAPUT
-
4.THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, NANDAPUR
-
5.THE CHAIRPERSON, SCHOOL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, BUDHADEV VIDYAPITHA UP(ME) SCHOOL, HIKIMPUT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
The High Court of Orissa directed the District Education Officer (Opposite Party No.3) to consider Madhumita Panda's pending representation for approval of her appointment as an Assistant Teacher under the grant-in-aid scheme and communicate a final decision within eight weeks. The court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, finding the petitioner's request reasonable given that her case had been pending despite a prior court direction and proper qualifications (B.Ed degree obtained in 2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/9774/2026
The High Court of Orissa directed the District Education Officer (Opposite Party No.3) to consider Madhumita Panda's pending representation for approval of her appointment as an Assistant Teacher under the grant-in-aid scheme and communicate a final decision within eight weeks. The court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, finding the petitioner's request reasonable given that her case had been pending despite a prior court direction and proper qualifications (B.Ed degree obtained in 2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts