A.ARUN KUMAR M/S.ADYASIHI MISHRA vs USHA PADHEE, I.A.S — CONTC/1786/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010198722026
Filing Number
CONTC/11683/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
CONTC/1786/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )
Sub-Category
OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A.ARUN KUMAR M/S.ADYASIHI MISHRA
-
2.DEBENDRANATH JEE
-
3.ARUPA DAS
-
4.DILLIP KUMAR JENA
-
5.BABAJI BEHERA
-
6.GANGADHAR MALLICK
-
7.BRAJA KISHOR RAJ
-
8.SARBESWAR SAHOO
-
9.RANJEET PRASAD JENA
-
10.NARENDRA SAHOO
-
11.PANCHANAN BEHERA
-
12.BRUNDABAN NAYAK
-
13.RADHA KRUSHNA MOHANTY
-
14.BUDHI BEHERA
-
15.UTTAM CHARAN PRADHAN
-
16.PRASANTA KUMAR SENAPATI
-
17.BANKA BIHARI MOHANTY
-
18.JANAK RAJ
-
19.AKSHAY KUMAR BEHERA
-
20.SARAT KUMAR KHUNTIA
-
21.RABINDRA BEHERA
-
22.RAJESH PRUSTY
-
23.SADAY KUMAR BOSE
Respondent(s)
-
1.USHA PADHEE, I.A.S
-
2.ARINDAM DAKUA,IAS
-
3.KIRANDEEP KAUR SAHOTA,IAS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of a contempt petition filed by A. Arun Kumar against Usha Padhee, IAS for non-compliance with an order dated 28.11.2025, granting the opposite parties one additional month to comply. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CONTC/1786/2026
The High Court of Orissa disposed of a contempt petition filed by A. Arun Kumar against Usha Padhee, IAS for non-compliance with an order dated 28.11.2025, granting the opposite parties one additional month to comply. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts