A.ARUN KUMAR M/S.ADYASIHI MISHRA vs USHA PADHEE, I.A.S — CONTC/1786/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

CNR: ODHC010198722026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CONTC/11683/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

CONTC/1786/2026

Registration Date

25-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12
Constitution of India, 1950 Section 215

Petitioner(s)

A.ARUN KUMAR M/S.ADYASIHI MISHRA

DEBENDRANATH JEE

ARUPA DAS

DILLIP KUMAR JENA

BABAJI BEHERA

GANGADHAR MALLICK

BRAJA KISHOR RAJ

SARBESWAR SAHOO

RANJEET PRASAD JENA

NARENDRA SAHOO

PANCHANAN BEHERA

BRUNDABAN NAYAK

RADHA KRUSHNA MOHANTY

BUDHI BEHERA

UTTAM CHARAN PRADHAN

PRASANTA KUMAR SENAPATI

BANKA BIHARI MOHANTY

JANAK RAJ

AKSHAY KUMAR BEHERA

SARAT KUMAR KHUNTIA

RABINDRA BEHERA

RAJESH PRUSTY

SADAY KUMAR BOSE

Respondent(s)

USHA PADHEE, I.A.S

ARINDAM DAKUA,IAS

KIRANDEEP KAUR SAHOTA,IAS

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

09-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a contempt petition filed by A. Arun Kumar against Usha Padhee, IAS for non-compliance with an order dated 28.11.2025, granting the opposite parties one additional month to comply. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a contempt petition filed by A. Arun Kumar against Usha Padhee, IAS for non-compliance with an order dated 28.11.2025, granting the opposite parties one additional month to comply. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case