DILIP KUMAR DASH M/S.SRIDHAR RATH vs RASHMIREKHA CHHATAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER , MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION , DEOGARH — CONTC/1633/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010198542026

Filing Number

CONTC/11674/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CONTC/1633/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12
Constitution of India, 1950 Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILIP KUMAR DASH M/S.SRIDHAR RATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RASHMIREKHA CHHATAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER , MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION , DEOGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of a contempt petition filed by Dilip Kumar Dash after the Superintending Engineer released the provisional pension that was the subject of the petition. Since the relief sought had already been granted, the petitioner's counsel declined to proceed further, and the court disposed of the contempt petition as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONTC/1633/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a contempt petition filed by Dilip Kumar Dash after the Superintending Engineer released the provisional pension that was the subject of the petition. Since the relief sought had already been granted, the petitioner's counsel declined to proceed further, and the court disposed of the contempt petition as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case