BHAGYASHREE MOHANTY vs UNION OF INDIA — WP(C)/8465/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010196512026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/11549/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/8465/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGYASHREE MOHANTY
Adv. GANESWAR BEHERA,S.K.BARAL, J.SAHOO, S.R.ACHARYA, M.K.BISWAL,S.K.BARAL, J.SAHOO, S.R.ACHARYA, M.K.BISWAL, S.K.BARAL, J.SAHOO, S.R.ACHARYA, M.K.BISWAL
-
2.ABINASH DEHURY
-
3.ANIRUDHA PARIDA
-
4.HEMSAGAR BHUE
-
5.KRISHNA PRADHAN
-
6.SURENDRA KUMAR PATNAIK
-
7.SUSHREE SMRUTILAXMI NAYAK
-
8.SUKADEV NAYAK
-
9.SWORNAPRAVA SINGH
-
10.DEBABRATA PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
-
2.STATE OF ODISHA
-
3.DIRECTOR OF SCHEDULED TRIBE, S.T. AND S.C. DEVELOPMENT DEPT., BHUBANESWAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
The Orissa High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Union of India within 3 weeks, enclosing all relevant documents supporting her claim against the dissolution order dated 17.02.2026. The court directed the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within 3 months of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, thereby providing an administrative remedy rather than quashing the dissolution order directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/8465/2026
The Orissa High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Union of India within 3 weeks, enclosing all relevant documents supporting her claim against the dissolution order dated 17.02.2026. The court directed the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within 3 months of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, thereby providing an administrative remedy rather than quashing the dissolution order directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts