BHAGYASHREE MOHANTY vs UNION OF INDIA — WP(C) /8465/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010196512026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(C) /11549/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C) /8465/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Coram
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAGYASHREE MOHANTY
Adv. GANESWAR BEHERA,S.K.BARAL, J.SAHOO, S.R.ACHARYA, M.K.BISWAL,S.K.BARAL, J.SAHOO, S.R.ACHARYA, M.K.BISWAL, S.K.BARAL, J.SAHOO, S.R.ACHARYA, M.K.BISWAL
ABINASH DEHURY
ANIRUDHA PARIDA
HEMSAGAR BHUE
KRISHNA PRADHAN
SURENDRA KUMAR PATNAIK
SUSHREE SMRUTILAXMI NAYAK
SUKADEV NAYAK
SWORNAPRAVA SINGH
DEBABRATA PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA
STATE OF ODISHA
DIRECTOR OF SCHEDULED TRIBE, S.T. AND S.C. DEVELOPMENT DEPT., BHUBANESWAR
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The Orissa High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Union of India within 3 weeks, enclosing all relevant documents supporting her claim against the dissolution order dated 17.02.2026. The court directed the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within 3 months of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, thereby providing an administrative remedy rather than quashing the dissolution order directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Orissa High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Union of India within 3 weeks, enclosing all relevant documents supporting her claim against the dissolution order dated 17.02.2026. The court directed the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within 3 months of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner, thereby providing an administrative remedy rather than quashing the dissolution order directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts