STRITIK PRADHAN vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/8723/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010192782026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/11323/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/8723/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Coram

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STRITIK PRADHAN

    Adv. RAJIV KUMAR MAHANTA,S.K.DWIBEDI, U.C.BISWAL,S.K.DWIBEDI, U.C.BISWAL, S.K.DWIBEDI, U.C.BISWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.CHIEF ENGINEER, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, ODISHA

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MAHANADI NORTH DIVISION, CUTTACK

  4. 4.ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, KENDUPATNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the Superintending Engineer, Mahanadi North Division-1, Cuttack, to consider the petitioner's grievance as per his representations and decide the matter in accordance with law within two months. The court granted limited relief by mandating administrative review rather than adjudicating the substantive dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/8723/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the Superintending Engineer, Mahanadi North Division-1, Cuttack, to consider the petitioner's grievance as per his representations and decide the matter in accordance with law within two months. The court granted limited relief by mandating administrative review rather than adjudicating the substantive dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case