SIDDHARTHA SANKAR PARIDA vs GIRISH S.N, COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, PR AND DW DEPTT., BHUBANESWAR — CONTC/1662/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010190982026

Filing Number

CONTC/11197/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CONTC/1662/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12
Constitution of India, 1950 Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIDDHARTHA SANKAR PARIDA

    Adv. KRUSHNA CHANDRA DASH,M.K.SAHOO, S.K.DAS,M.K.SAHOO, S.K.DAS, M.K.SAHOO, S.K.DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIRISH S.N, COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, PR AND DW DEPTT., BHUBANESWAR

  2. 2.INDRAMANI NAYAK,DIRECTOR,PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPT.,BHUBANESWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of a Contempt Petition filed by Siddhartha Sankar Parida against non-compliance with an earlier court order dated 14.11.2025, granting the opposite parties (government officials) one month further time to comply. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONTC/1662/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a Contempt Petition filed by Siddhartha Sankar Parida against non-compliance with an earlier court order dated 14.11.2025, granting the opposite parties (government officials) one month further time to comply. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case