N.V.JAYAPRAKASH RAO PATNAIK vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /8274/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010189692026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C) /11123/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /8274/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

N.V.JAYAPRAKASH RAO PATNAIK

Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR MAHAPATRA,N.PATRA, A.N.HOTA,N.PATRA, A.N.HOTA, N.PATRA, A.N.HOTA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPT., ODISHA

COLLECTOR, BARGARH

B.D.O., PANCHAYAT SAMITI OFFICE, JHARBANDH

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), ODISHA

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to submit a detailed representation to Opposite Party No. 3 within three weeks, seeking Rs. 5400 as 3rd RACP with retirement benefits based on Resolution No. 5073 (2025). The court directed the opposite party to decide the representation within three months and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than immediately granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to submit a detailed representation to Opposite Party No. 3 within three weeks, seeking Rs. 5400 as 3rd RACP with retirement benefits based on Resolution No. 5073 (2025). The court directed the opposite party to decide the representation within three months and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than immediately granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case