N.V.JAYAPRAKASH RAO PATNAIK vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/8274/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010189692026

Filing Number

WP(C)/11123/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/8274/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.V.JAYAPRAKASH RAO PATNAIK

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR MAHAPATRA,N.PATRA, A.N.HOTA,N.PATRA, A.N.HOTA, N.PATRA, A.N.HOTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPT., ODISHA

  3. 3.COLLECTOR, BARGARH

  4. 4.B.D.O., PANCHAYAT SAMITI OFFICE, JHARBANDH

  5. 5.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to submit a detailed representation to Opposite Party No. 3 within three weeks, seeking Rs. 5400 as 3rd RACP with retirement benefits based on Resolution No. 5073 (2025). The court directed the opposite party to decide the representation within three months and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than immediately granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/8274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to submit a detailed representation to Opposite Party No. 3 within three weeks, seeking Rs. 5400 as 3rd RACP with retirement benefits based on Resolution No. 5073 (2025). The court directed the opposite party to decide the representation within three months and communicate the order to the petitioner, rather than immediately granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case