PINKY GUPTA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/8340/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010187402026

Filing Number

WP(C)/10978/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/8340/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINKY GUPTA

    Adv. ARUPANANDA GOSWAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR CUM DIST.MAGISTRATE, SUNDARGARH

  3. 3.SUB COLLECTOR, PANPOSH

  4. 4.TAHSILDAR CUM EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, LATHIKATA

  5. 5.REVENUE INSPECTOR, JALDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sashikanta MishraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Pinky Gupta regarding the delayed mutation of her land (Mutation Case No. 3832 of 2025). The court directed the Tahasildar, Lathikata to dispose of the mutation case within four weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of the court's order, addressing the petitioner's grievance of inaction in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/8340/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Pinky Gupta regarding the delayed mutation of her land (Mutation Case No. 3832 of 2025). The court directed the Tahasildar, Lathikata to dispose of the mutation case within four weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of the court's order, addressing the petitioner's grievance of inaction in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case