JAGABANDHU DHARUA vs UNION OF INDIA — WP(C) /8488/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010186242026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C) /10898/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /8488/2026

Registration Date

17-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

01-SELECTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

JAGABANDHU DHARUA

Adv. DHANESWAR BEHERA,M.PANDA,M.PANDA, M.PANDA

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA

REGIONAL DIRECTOR, STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, KOLKATA

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE(RECRUITMENT), BHUBANESWAR

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GROUP CENTRE, CRPF, BHUBANESWAR

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the petitioner to file an objection within 10 days regarding his inclusion in the "withheld candidates" list for the Constable (G.D.) CAPF recruitment 2024, noting that no reason was assigned for withholding his candidature despite his eligibility and participation in physical tests. The court mandated that the opposite party decide on the objection within 2 weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the petitioner to file an objection within 10 days regarding his inclusion in the "withheld candidates" list for the Constable (G.D.) CAPF recruitment 2024, noting that no reason was assigned for withholding his candidature despite his eligibility and participation in physical tests. The court mandated that the opposite party decide on the objection within 2 weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case