SHISHIR KUMAR NAIK vs UNION OF INDIA — WP(C) /8501/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227,. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010186112026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C) /10889/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /8501/2026

Registration Date

17-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

01-SELECTION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227,

Petitioner(s)

SHISHIR KUMAR NAIK

Adv. MADHUMITA PANDA,D.BEHERA,D.BEHERA, D.BEHERA

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA

REGIONAL DIRECTOR (E.R.)STAFF SELECTION COMMISSSION ,WEST BENGAL

D.I.G. (RECRUITMENT) O/O- DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CRPF RECRUITMENT BRANCH EAST,NEW DELHI

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GROUP CENTRE, CRPF,BHUBANESWAR

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Summary The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition with directions that the petitioner, who was eligible and permitted to appear for Physical Standard and Efficiency Tests for a Constable position in CAPFs 2024, may file an objection within 10 days regarding his inclusion in the "withheld candidates" list without assigned reasons. The court directed the authority (O.P. No.3) to take a lawful decision on the objection and communicate results within 2 weeks, finding the withholding unjustified without stated grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition with directions that the petitioner, who was eligible and permitted to appear for Physical Standard and Efficiency Tests for a Constable position in CAPFs 2024, may file an objection within 10 days regarding his inclusion in the "withheld candidates" list without assigned reasons. The court directed the authority (O.P. No.3) to take a lawful decision on the objection and communicate results within 2 weeks, finding the withholding unjustified without stated grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case