RABIKANTA JENA vs BENUDHAR JENA — CMP/476/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010184862026

Filing Number

CMP/10805/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CMP/476/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABIKANTA JENA

    Adv. SAROJ KUMAR PADHI,N.C.ROUT,N.C.ROUT, N.C.ROUT

  2. 2.SUMATI JENA

  3. 3.SARAT JENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BENUDHAR JENA

  2. 2.HARIHAR JENA

  3. 3.NIALI JENA

  4. 4.CHAMPA JENA

  5. 5.FAKIRA JENA

  6. 6.KANDURU JENA

  7. 7.BHRAMARA JENA

  8. 8.BIMBA JENA

  9. 9.BATA KRUSHNA JENA

  10. 10.SUKRAMANI JENA

  11. 11.BANKI JENA

  12. 12.KANDURI JENA

  13. 13.TULA JENA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the CMP application challenging a 2019 trial court order that directed the plaintiffs to implead the deity Sri Baladev Jew as a necessary party in the final decree proceedings. The court declined to interfere, holding that the trial court properly exercised its discretion under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and noting the unreasonable six-year delay in challenging the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission 1

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/476/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the CMP application challenging a 2019 trial court order that directed the plaintiffs to implead the deity Sri Baladev Jew as a necessary party in the final decree proceedings. The court declined to interfere, holding that the trial court properly exercised its discretion under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and noting the unreasonable six-year delay in challenging the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case