RABIKANTA JENA vs BENUDHAR JENA — CMP /476/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010184862026
Filing Number
CMP /10805/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
CMP /476/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Coram
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RABIKANTA JENA
Adv. SAROJ KUMAR PADHI,N.C.ROUT,N.C.ROUT, N.C.ROUT
SUMATI JENA
SARAT JENA
Respondent(s)
BENUDHAR JENA
HARIHAR JENA
NIALI JENA
CHAMPA JENA
FAKIRA JENA
KANDURU JENA
BHRAMARA JENA
BIMBA JENA
BATA KRUSHNA JENA
SUKRAMANI JENA
BANKI JENA
KANDURI JENA
TULA JENA
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
FRESH ADMISSION 1
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION 1 |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the CMP application challenging a 2019 trial court order that directed the plaintiffs to implead the deity Sri Baladev Jew as a necessary party in the final decree proceedings. The court declined to interfere, holding that the trial court properly exercised its discretion under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and noting the unreasonable six-year delay in challenging the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the CMP application challenging a 2019 trial court order that directed the plaintiffs to implead the deity Sri Baladev Jew as a necessary party in the final decree proceedings. The court declined to interfere, holding that the trial court properly exercised its discretion under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and noting the unreasonable six-year delay in challenging the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts