PRATEEK KUMAR MOHARANA @ PRATEEK MOHARANA BRAJA BHUSAN SAHOO, S. K. ROUTRAY vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC /887/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010181422026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

CRLMC /7521/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

CRLMC /887/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Judge

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Coram

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

PRATEEK KUMAR MOHARANA @ PRATEEK MOHARANA BRAJA BHUSAN SAHOO, S. K. ROUTRAY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

Hearing History

Judge: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - APPLICATION U/S 482 Cr.P.C. - BAIL JUMP/QUASHMENT OF NBW

Orders

24-03-2026
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

The High Court of Orissa quashed the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against petitioner Prateek Kumar Moharana, finding his absence on 13.09.2024 was due to miscommunication by his counsel rather than willful default. The court allowed his petition based on his consistent court attendance since bail in June 2023 and his undertaking to cooperate till trial, directing him to surrender and apply for bail within 15 working days with stringent conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa quashed the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against petitioner Prateek Kumar Moharana, finding his absence on 13.09.2024 was due to miscommunication by his counsel rather than willful default. The court allowed his petition based on his consistent court attendance since bail in June 2023 and his undertaking to cooperate till trial, directing him to surrender and apply for bail within 15 working days with stringent conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case