STATE OF ODISHA SIDHARTH PRASAD DAS, A.S.C. vs GOPINATH SWAIN — WA /727/2025

Case under Orissa High Court Rules 1948 Section 4,2,VIII. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010180902025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

11-03-2025

Filing Number

WA /10348/2025

Filing Date

12-03-2025

Registration No

WA /727/2025

Registration Date

15-04-2025

Judge

MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Coram

MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

ORISSA HIGH COURT RULES 1948 Section 4,2,VIII
Letter Patents of Patna H.C. Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF ODISHA SIDHARTH PRASAD DAS, A.S.C.

DIRECTOR ,ELEMENTARY EDUCATION , ODISHA

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, JAGATSINGHPUR

BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, BALIKUDA

Respondent(s)

GOPINATH SWAIN

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

09-07-2025

FOR ORDERS - (WRIT APPEAL)

24-03-2026

LEFT OVER LIST-2 (FOR ORDERS)

23-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

16-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

20-02-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S.,MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed the State of Odisha's appeal, finding it substantially similar to an earlier case (Minarani Mohanty v. State of Odisha) where employee benefits were granted and upheld on appeal. The court rejected the State's delay condonation application as unsatisfactory and directed the State to implement the Single Judge's order within three months, threatening contempt proceedings for non-compliance, as similar benefits had already been extended to two other similarly situated persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed the State of Odisha's appeal, finding it substantially similar to an earlier case (Minarani Mohanty v. State of Odisha) where employee benefits were granted and upheld on appeal. The court rejected the State's delay condonation application as unsatisfactory and directed the State to implement the Single Judge's order within three months, threatening contempt proceedings for non-compliance, as similar benefits had already been extended to two other similarly situated persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case