CHANDRA PRAVA MOHANTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/8508/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010179582026

Filing Number

WP(C)/10500/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/8508/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRA PRAVA MOHANTY

    Adv. PRASANTA KUMAR DAS,S.ROUT,S.ROUT, S.ROUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF ODISHA , WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT

  3. 3.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF ODISHA, FINANCE

  4. 4.DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER, DHENKANAL

  5. 5.SUB COLLECTOR, KAMAKHYA NAGAR, DHENKANAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition seeking RACP/MASCP benefits without issuing a mandamus, instead directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before Opposite Party No. 2 within three weeks with supporting documents. The court ordered the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the decision to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/8508/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition seeking RACP/MASCP benefits without issuing a mandamus, instead directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before Opposite Party No. 2 within three weeks with supporting documents. The court ordered the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the decision to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case