CHANDRA PRAVA MOHANTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /8508/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010179582026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C) /10500/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /8508/2026

Registration Date

17-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

CHANDRA PRAVA MOHANTY

Adv. PRASANTA KUMAR DAS,S.ROUT,S.ROUT, S.ROUT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF ODISHA , WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF ODISHA, FINANCE

DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER, DHENKANAL

SUB COLLECTOR, KAMAKHYA NAGAR, DHENKANAL

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition seeking RACP/MASCP benefits without issuing a mandamus, instead directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before Opposite Party No. 2 within three weeks with supporting documents. The court ordered the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the decision to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition seeking RACP/MASCP benefits without issuing a mandamus, instead directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before Opposite Party No. 2 within three weeks with supporting documents. The court ordered the opposite party to take a lawful decision on the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the decision to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case