SATYA SWARUP DASH MOHAMMED FARADISH, K.SATTAR, U.SAMANTARAY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /8170/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010177442026
Filing Number
WP(C) /10380/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C) /8170/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Coram
MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATYA SWARUP DASH MOHAMMED FARADISH, K.SATTAR, U.SAMANTARAY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
THE COLLECTOR KHORDHA
THE ADM BHUBANESWAR
THE TAHASILDAR BHUBANESWAR
THE ADDL. TAHASILDAR, BHUBANESWAR
THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, KALARAHANGA
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa held that government circulars/notifications operate prospectively and have no retrospective effect, and directed the Additional Tahasildar to reconsider the petitioner's land status conversion from Stitiban to Pattadar within four weeks based on established legal principles. The court stayed the impugned order dated 21.08.2025, finding that since the initial circular was applied retrospectively, all consequential actions taken pursuant to it would be void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa held that government circulars/notifications operate prospectively and have no retrospective effect, and directed the Additional Tahasildar to reconsider the petitioner's land status conversion from Stitiban to Pattadar within four weeks based on established legal principles. The court stayed the impugned order dated 21.08.2025, finding that since the initial circular was applied retrospectively, all consequential actions taken pursuant to it would be void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts