SATYA SWARUP DASH MOHAMMED FARADISH, K.SATTAR, U.SAMANTARAY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/8170/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010177442026

Filing Number

WP(C)/10380/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/8170/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYA SWARUP DASH MOHAMMED FARADISH, K.SATTAR, U.SAMANTARAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR KHORDHA

  3. 3.THE ADM BHUBANESWAR

  4. 4.THE TAHASILDAR BHUBANESWAR

  5. 5.THE ADDL. TAHASILDAR, BHUBANESWAR

  6. 6.THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, KALARAHANGA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sashikanta MishraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa held that government circulars/notifications operate prospectively and have no retrospective effect, and directed the Additional Tahasildar to reconsider the petitioner's land status conversion from Stitiban to Pattadar within four weeks based on established legal principles. The court stayed the impugned order dated 21.08.2025, finding that since the initial circular was applied retrospectively, all consequential actions taken pursuant to it would be void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/8170/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa held that government circulars/notifications operate prospectively and have no retrospective effect, and directed the Additional Tahasildar to reconsider the petitioner's land status conversion from Stitiban to Pattadar within four weeks based on established legal principles. The court stayed the impugned order dated 21.08.2025, finding that since the initial circular was applied retrospectively, all consequential actions taken pursuant to it would be void. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case