KALPANA SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/807/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010174182026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
CRLMC/7223/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLMC/807/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
Coram
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALPANA SAHOO
Adv. SRINIVAS MOHANTY,K.PATRA, S.R.MOHANTY, E.DASH,K.PATRA, S.R.MOHANTY, E.DASH, K.PATRA, S.R.MOHANTY, E.DASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
For Admission - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 Bnss
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
15-Apr-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
The case (CRLMC No.807 of 2026) in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack was taken up for amicable settlement between petitioner Kalpana Sahoo and Opposite Party No.2 on 15.04.2026. The court heard both parties in person and adjourned the matter to 20th April, 2026, while continuing the interim order passed earlier. Personal appearance of the parties has been dispensed with for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
For Admission - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 Bnss
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
31-Mar-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 Bnss.
Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi
-
13-Mar-2026
Dr. Justice S.K. PanigrahiView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMC/807/2026
The case (CRLMC No.807 of 2026) in the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack was taken up for amicable settlement between petitioner Kalpana Sahoo and Opposite Party No.2 on 15.04.2026. The court heard both parties in person and adjourned the matter to 20th April, 2026, while continuing the interim order passed earlier. Personal appearance of the parties has been dispensed with for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts