BINOD BIHARI MOHANTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/8021/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010169632026

Filing Number

WP(C)/9892/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/8021/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

SALARY/ARREAR SALARY ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BINOD BIHARI MOHANTY

    Adv. PRAFULLA KUMAR MOHAPATRA,S.C.SAHOO,S.C.SAHOO, S.C.SAHOO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR AND DIST.MAGISTRATE, DHENKANAL

  3. 3.TAHASILDAR, GONDIA TAHASIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa directed the State of Odisha (Opposite Party No.2) to decide on retired employee Binod Bihari Mohanty's representation regarding pending arrear dues and 7th pay revision arrears within two months, without expressing any opinion on the merits. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive to ensure timely consideration of the petitioner's legitimate claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/8021/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa directed the State of Odisha (Opposite Party No.2) to decide on retired employee Binod Bihari Mohanty's representation regarding pending arrear dues and 7th pay revision arrears within two months, without expressing any opinion on the merits. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive to ensure timely consideration of the petitioner's legitimate claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case