ASHOK KUMAR JENA BABITA KUMARI PATTANAIK vs SATYABRATA SAHOO, SEC.,HOME DEPT., BHUBANESWAR — CONTC/1391/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010169552026

Filing Number

CONTC/9886/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

CONTC/1391/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR JENA BABITA KUMARI PATTANAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATYABRATA SAHOO, SEC.,HOME DEPT., BHUBANESWAR

  2. 2.Y.B.KHURANIA, DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ODISHA

  3. 3.S.PRAVEEN KUMAR, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (PERSONNEL),ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of a Contempt Petition filed by Ashok Kumar Jena regarding non-compliance with a court order dated 29.01.2026, by granting the opposite parties (Satyabrata Sahoo and others) one month additional time to comply with the original order. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONTC/1391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a Contempt Petition filed by Ashok Kumar Jena regarding non-compliance with a court order dated 29.01.2026, by granting the opposite parties (Satyabrata Sahoo and others) one month additional time to comply with the original order. The court warned that failure to comply within the extended period would be treated as deliberate violation of court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case