BASUDEV BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC /885/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010164952026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRLMC /6868/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

CRLMC /885/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Judge

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Coram

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 Section 482
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

BASUDEV BEHERA

Adv. DEBASNAN DAS,S.S.PATTNAIK, B.B.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, A.PRIYA, B.B.PRADHAN, H.K.TANDI, J.MAJHI,S.S.PATTNAIK, B.B.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, A.PRIYA, B.B.PRADHAN, H.K.TANDI, J.MAJHI, S.S.PATTNAIK, B.B.SAHOO, S.SATAPATHY, A.PRIYA, B.B.PRADHAN, H.K.TANDI, J.MAJHI

GAURANGA MOHANTY@DEBASISH MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

Hearing History

Judge: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C.

Orders

24-03-2026
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the petitioners' Criminal Revision petition challenging the lower court's rejection of their application to summon defence witnesses in an assault case pending since 2004. The court found no merit in the petition as the petitioners failed to explain why the witness examination was necessary or how their evidence was relevant, and noted the substantial delay in filing the petition after the accused's examination, suggesting an attempt to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the petitioners' Criminal Revision petition challenging the lower court's rejection of their application to summon defence witnesses in an assault case pending since 2004. The court found no merit in the petition as the petitioners failed to explain why the witness examination was necessary or how their evidence was relevant, and noted the substantial delay in filing the petition after the accused's examination, suggesting an attempt to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case