SNIGDHA DAS vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/2948/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010158002026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/6617/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/2948/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

Coram

Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaik

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SNIGDHA DAS

    Adv. TANMAY MISHRA,A.S.MAHAPRASHASTA, S.PATI,A.S.MAHAPRASHASTA, S.PATI, A.S.MAHAPRASHASTA, S.PATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice R.k.pattanaikView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa granted pre-arrest bail to three petitioners (Archana Sahoo, Basanti Singh, and Snigdha Das) in a case involving fund misappropriation, finding that they had not been chargesheeted as the final investigation report was filed only against the Executive Officer and one Municipal employee. Each petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 30,000 with a solvent surety and to cooperate with the investigating officer during ongoing investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/2948/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa granted pre-arrest bail to three petitioners (Archana Sahoo, Basanti Singh, and Snigdha Das) in a case involving fund misappropriation, finding that they had not been chargesheeted as the final investigation report was filed only against the Executive Officer and one Municipal employee. Each petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 30,000 with a solvent surety and to cooperate with the investigating officer during ongoing investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case