PURANDAR BEHERA vs STATE OF ORISSA — WP(C)/7385/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010155942026

Filing Number

WP(C)/9043/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/7385/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Coram

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Sub-Category

ORISSA PREVENTION OF LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PURANDAR BEHERA

    Adv. AKSHAYA KUMAR SAHOO,P.K. NAYAK,P.K. NAYAK, P.K. NAYAK

  2. 2.HARIHAR BEHERA

  3. 3.ARJUN BEHERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ORISSA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR, DEOGARH

  3. 3.SUB COLLECTOR, DEOGARH

  4. 4.TAHASILDAR, DEOGARH

  5. 5.EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DEOGARH MUNICIPALITY, DEOGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the Executive Officer of Deogarh Municipality to consider the petitioners' grievance and take a decision in accordance with law within six weeks. The court imposed an interim protection preventing the petitioners' eviction from the disputed land until the Municipality's decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/7385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the Executive Officer of Deogarh Municipality to consider the petitioners' grievance and take a decision in accordance with law within six weeks. The court imposed an interim protection preventing the petitioners' eviction from the disputed land until the Municipality's decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case