HIMANSU SEKHAR JENA vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMP /355/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010153882026
Filing Number
CRLMP /6454/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
CRLMP /355/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Judge
MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Coram
MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HIMANSU SEKHAR JENA
Adv. TAPAS KUMAR DWIBEDI,G.C.MOHANTY,G.C.MOHANTY, G.C.MOHANTY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ODISHA
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CUTTACK
INSPECTOR INCHARGE, JAGATPUR POLICE STATION
SUNIL KUMAR BEHERA @ SANDHA
HUMAYAN HYDER ALI KHAN @ HAPI
AKASH BISWAL @ MUNA
Hearing History
Judge: MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION 1
FOR ORDERS - CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
FRESH ADMISSION 1
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION | |
| 08-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION 1 | |
| 07-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS - CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS | |
| 07-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION 1 | |
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, finding that investigation and charge sheet filing were properly conducted with two accused charged under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 296, and 3(5), supported by witness testimony confirming only two assailants. The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the charge sheet before the appropriate forum if aggrieved, as that remedy is available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, finding that investigation and charge sheet filing were properly conducted with two accused charged under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 296, and 3(5), supported by witness testimony confirming only two assailants. The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the charge sheet before the appropriate forum if aggrieved, as that remedy is available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts