TAPAN KUMAR BEHERA SATYAJIT MOHAPATRA, K.MOHANTY, A.PRADHAN, K.SETHI vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMP /296/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227,. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010143292026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRLMP /6052/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

CRLMP /296/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Judge

MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Coram

MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227,

Petitioner(s)

TAPAN KUMAR BEHERA SATYAJIT MOHAPATRA, K.MOHANTY, A.PRADHAN, K.SETHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ODISHA,CUTTACK

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANGUL

INSPECTOR-IN-CHARGE, TALCHER POLICE STATION,ANGUL

Hearing History

Judge: MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

12-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

31-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION 1

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

12-03-2026
MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
24-03-2026
MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
31-03-2026
MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Criminal Revision (CRLMP) filed by Tapan Kumar Behera, who sought directions to register an FIR and conduct a fair inquiry against accused persons. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to proceed with the case and requested withdrawal, which the court granted. The police had also submitted that neither the petitioner nor the accused parties visited the police station on the alleged date, making confrontation impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Criminal Revision (CRLMP) filed by Tapan Kumar Behera, who sought directions to register an FIR and conduct a fair inquiry against accused persons. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to proceed with the case and requested withdrawal, which the court granted. The police had also submitted that neither the petitioner nor the accused parties visited the police station on the alleged date, making confrontation impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India, 1950 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case