STATE OF ORISSA A.G.A. vs DILLIP KU.SAHU — FAO/382/2018
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010138442018
Filing Number
FAO/382/2018
Filing Date
11-Apr-2018
Registration No
FAO/382/2018
Registration Date
11-Apr-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Coram
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ACADEMIC MATTERS ( 1 )
Sub-Category
01-GRANT IN AID ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF ORISSA A.G.A.
-
2.DIRECTOR,HIGHER EDUCATION,ODISHA,HEADS OF DEPARTMENT BUILDING,BHUBANESWAR,KHURDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DILLIP KU.SAHU
-
2.G.B. OF BRAHMABARADA MOHAVIDYALAYA,BARADA VIHAR,BRAHMABARADA,JAJPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the First Appeal (FAO No.382 of 2018) filed by the State of Odisha, finding that the issues in the case were already covered by the Court's prior judgment in FAO No.509 of 2014. The Court granted liberty to the State's counsel to seek variation or modification of the order if the opposite parties' submissions are found to be incorrect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
-
14-Aug-2023
For Hearing U/O.xli.r-11,C.p.c.
Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar (Cj)
-
17-Jul-2023
Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar (Cj)View PDF
-
17-Jul-2023
Revoked
Mr. Justice K. S. Jhaveri (Cj)
-
05-Jul-2023
Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar (Cj)View PDF
-
05-Jul-2023
Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar (Cj)View PDF
-
16-Oct-2019
Mr. Justice K. S. Jhaveri (Cj)View PDF
-
16-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2018
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/382/2018
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the First Appeal (FAO No.382 of 2018) filed by the State of Odisha, finding that the issues in the case were already covered by the Court's prior judgment in FAO No.509 of 2014. The Court granted liberty to the State's counsel to seek variation or modification of the order if the opposite parties' submissions are found to be incorrect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts