CHINMAYA PASAYAT vs UDAY A KAOLE, CHAIRMAN CUM M.D., MAHANADI COALFIELD LTD., SAMBALPUR — CONTC /1329/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010138022026
Filing Number
CONTC /7935/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
CONTC /1329/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Judge
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Coram
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )
Sub-Category
OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHINMAYA PASAYAT
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR NANDA,A.NANDA, S.DAS, S.S.PRADHAN, P.K.SAHU,A.NANDA, S.DAS, S.S.PRADHAN, P.K.SAHU, A.NANDA, S.DAS, S.S.PRADHAN, P.K.SAHU
AMITAV SAHU
JIBARDHAN KUMBHAR
ARUPANANDA GEJA
SURAJ KUMAR BADHEI
SUDHIR KUMAR MUNDA
Respondent(s)
UDAY A KAOLE, CHAIRMAN CUM M.D., MAHANADI COALFIELD LTD., SAMBALPUR
KESHAV RAO., DIRECTOR PERSONNEL, MAHANADI COALFIELDS, SAMBALPUR
BISWABASH BEHURIA, GENERAL MANAGER, PERSONNEL, MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITED,SAMBALPUR
Hearing History
Judge: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
FRESH ADMISSION 1
FRESH ADMISSION 1
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION 1 | |
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION 1 |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the contempt proceedings against Uday A Kaole (Chairman-cum-Managing Director of Mahanadi Coalfields Limited) without passing any order, citing the pendency of a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court challenging the High Court's earlier orders. The court preserved the petitioner's right to seek restoration of the contempt case if the Supreme Court affirms the High Court's orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the contempt proceedings against Uday A Kaole (Chairman-cum-Managing Director of Mahanadi Coalfields Limited) without passing any order, citing the pendency of a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court challenging the High Court's earlier orders. The court preserved the petitioner's right to seek restoration of the contempt case if the Supreme Court affirms the High Court's orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts