TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., MUMBAI vs SIBA PRASAD MISHRA — CMP/378/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010137872026

Filing Number

CMP/7924/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

CMP/378/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., MUMBAI

    Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR NANDA,A.NANDA, S.DAS, S.S.PRADHAN, P.K.SAHU, M.PADHY,A.NANDA, S.DAS, S.S.PRADHAN, P.K.SAHU, M.PADHY, A.NANDA, S.DAS, S.S.PRADHAN, P.K.SAHU, M.PADHY

  2. 2.SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND HEAD, TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BANGALORE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIBA PRASAD MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed TATA AIG Life Insurance's petition challenging the trial court's rejection of their recall application. The court found that the defendant-company should have timely informed the trial court of the unavailability of required guidelines instead of filing a belated recall petition under Section 151 CPC, and found no jurisdictional error in the trial court's orders. However, the court granted liberty to the petitioners to bring the matter before the trial court again, which may then pass appropriate consequential orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission 1

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/378/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed TATA AIG Life Insurance's petition challenging the trial court's rejection of their recall application. The court found that the defendant-company should have timely informed the trial court of the unavailability of required guidelines instead of filing a belated recall petition under Section 151 CPC, and found no jurisdictional error in the trial court's orders. However, the court granted liberty to the petitioners to bring the matter before the trial court again, which may then pass appropriate consequential orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case