RATNAKAR BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/6539/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010136832026

Filing Number

WP(C)/7850/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/6539/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Coram

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )

Sub-Category

ORISSA PREVENTION OF LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATNAKAR BEHERA

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR BEHERA,K.KAR,K.KAR, K.KAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR,GANJAM

  3. 3.THE TAHASILDAR,KHALLIKOTE,GANJAM

  4. 4.CHAIRMAN, NAC, RAMBHA,GANJAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa allowed the writ petition and directed the Executive Officer of Rambha NAC to grant the petitioner a fair hearing before proceeding with eviction, citing violation of natural justice principles. The authority was ordered to take a decision within six weeks, and eviction was stayed until such hearing and decision are completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/6539/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa allowed the writ petition and directed the Executive Officer of Rambha NAC to grant the petitioner a fair hearing before proceeding with eviction, citing violation of natural justice principles. The authority was ordered to take a decision within six weeks, and eviction was stayed until such hearing and decision are completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case