SUBHENDRA KUMAR SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/6160/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010134382026

Filing Number

WP(C)/7712/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/6160/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

REGULARISATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHENDRA KUMAR SAHOO

    Adv. SASWATI MOHAPATRA, N.K.SINGH, B.RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.SECRETARY, LOKAYUTKTA, ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa directed the State of Odisha to decide on the petitioner's pending request (Annexure-5) within eight weeks in accordance with law, without expressing opinion on the merits. The court granted interim protection by prohibiting any coercive action against the petitioner until the decision is rendered, thereby disposing of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/6160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa directed the State of Odisha to decide on the petitioner's pending request (Annexure-5) within eight weeks in accordance with law, without expressing opinion on the merits. The court granted interim protection by prohibiting any coercive action against the petitioner until the decision is rendered, thereby disposing of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case