RM ORE AND METAL TRADING LLP, BHUBANESWAR vs ORISSA MINING CORPORATION, BHUBANESWAR — WP(C) /6408/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010134242026
Filing Number
WP(C) /7704/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
WP(C) /6408/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ) , MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Coram
MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ) , MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MINES, MINERALS AND MINING LEASES ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RM ORE AND METAL TRADING LLP, BHUBANESWAR
Adv. TANMAY MISHRA,S.DAS, T.SHREYASHI, D.NANDA,S.DAS, T.SHREYASHI, D.NANDA, S.DAS, T.SHREYASHI, D.NANDA
Respondent(s)
ORISSA MINING CORPORATION, BHUBANESWAR
REGIONAL MANAGER, KOIRA MINES MANAGER, KURUMITRA
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ) , MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
FRESH ADMISSION - MINES AND MINERALS
FRESH ADMISSION - MINES AND MINERALS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION - MINES AND MINERALS | |
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION - MINES AND MINERALS |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Orissa directed Odisha Mining Corporation to consider and dispose of RM Ore and Metal Trading LLP's pending representations (seeking time extension to lift remaining iron ore) within two weeks, after operational disruptions beyond the petitioner's control prevented contract completion. The court emphasized it expressed no opinion on the merits and granted the petitioner reasonable hearing opportunity before a final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Orissa directed Odisha Mining Corporation to consider and dispose of RM Ore and Metal Trading LLP's pending representations (seeking time extension to lift remaining iron ore) within two weeks, after operational disruptions beyond the petitioner's control prevented contract completion. The court emphasized it expressed no opinion on the merits and granted the petitioner reasonable hearing opportunity before a final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts