PRASANTA KUMAR DASH vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/6439/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010133242026

Filing Number

WP(C)/7648/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/6439/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTER ( 7 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO TELEPHONE, ELECTRICITY,WATER ETC. ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRASANTA KUMAR DASH

    Adv. GAGAN BIHARI SINGH,B.P.MOHANTY,B.P.MOHANTY, B.P.MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO), TPCODL

  3. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER- DIVISIONAL MANAGER, TPCODL, SALIPUR ELECTRICAL DIVISION

  4. 4.SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TPCODL, MAHANGA,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the electricity division within 3 weeks, with supporting documents for obtaining a feasibility report for solar panel installation. The court ordered the opposite party to take a lawful decision within 3 months of receiving the representation and communicate the decision to the petitioner, thereby disposing of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/6439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the electricity division within 3 weeks, with supporting documents for obtaining a feasibility report for solar panel installation. The court ordered the opposite party to take a lawful decision within 3 months of receiving the representation and communicate the decision to the petitioner, thereby disposing of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case