SANJEEB KUMAR MOHANTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /6216/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010127932026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C) /7354/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /6216/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

SANJEEB KUMAR MOHANTY

Adv. MANOJ KUMAR PANDA,S.S.CHHUALSINGH, M.MOHANTY,S.S.CHHUALSINGH, M.MOHANTY, S.S.CHHUALSINGH, M.MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

D.G. AND I.G. OF POLICE, CUTTACK

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BHUBANESWAR URBAN POLICE DISTRICT

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

24-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

The High Court of Orissa rejected the petitioner's request to stay the disciplinary proceeding (UPD Proceeding No.02/2019) until conclusion of the pending vigilance case on identical charges. The court permitted the disciplinary authority to continue proceedings but prohibited any final order until the vigilance case is disposed, directing the Special Judge (Vigilance) to complete the vigilance proceeding within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa rejected the petitioner's request to stay the disciplinary proceeding (UPD Proceeding No.02/2019) until conclusion of the pending vigilance case on identical charges. The court permitted the disciplinary authority to continue proceedings but prohibited any final order until the vigilance case is disposed, directing the Special Judge (Vigilance) to complete the vigilance proceeding within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case